USFL – The Trial
This summer marks the 25th anniversary of the USFLâs $1.69 billion antitrust suit against the NFL. The NFL was found guilty of using itâs monopoly power to damage the USFL, but jurors awarded the USFL only $1 after four days of deliberations.
The damages were trebled, so the USFL owners received $3 from the NFL. The check remains un-cashed in the desk of former Memphis Showboats executive, Steve Ehrhart, who is currently head of the Liberty Bowl.
What was at stake besides the billions of dollars? A possible merger with at least two USFL teams â one was Donald Trumpâs New Jersey Generals.
Many fans donât remember the impact the USFL had: Instant replay and the two-point conversion are just a few contributions the NFL adopted from the spring league. The USFL had success in cities like Phoenix, Jacksonville and Memphis, opening the door for future NFL franchises. Even and the now-controversial 18-game schedule was the norm in the USFLâs three-year run.
Oh by the way, just a few future Hall-of-Famers played in the USFL: Jim Kelly, Steve Young and Reggie White got their start in the fledgling spring league.
In my book, USFL- The Rebel League The NFL Didnât Respect but Feared, I had the chance to interview several former USFL players, general managers and broadcasters.
Read how Howard Cosell testified against the NFL and a young Trump âbulliedâ other owners to move the league to a fall schedule, which ultimately doomed the USFL.
This four-part series is nostalgic and informative. Enjoy the trip down memory lane.
Part 1 – The Fall of the USFL
Part 2 – The Trial
The USFL developed a loyal following in its three-year existence. The league had TV deals in place with ABC and ESPN worth over $240 million and leases with stadiums that housed NFL teams.
But if the league decided to move from a spring to a fall schedule, all that would change â and it did. Certain stadiums like the Vet in Philadelphia squashed their agreement with the Stars.
âThe Vet kicked us out of our offices, and we had to move to the ROTC building at the University of Pennsylvania,â said Stars coach Jim Mora in 2005, with a note of disdained in his voice. âAll the coaches were in one classroom, in separate corners, coming up with the game plans.â
More importantly, a fall move created a conflict with ABC – which carried the crowning jewel of NFL programming in the 1980s – Monday Night Football.
The NFL controlled the networks like a puppet on a string. The USFL never had a chance going head-to-head against the NFL.
Despite’s the league’s popularity, several teams were losing money. A renegade owner, named Donald Trump, didnât help matters as he ignored the mandate to remain fiscally conservative and stay away from the big-time players.
Trump, who bought the New Jersey Generals a season into the USFLâs existence, ignored the cries for financial temperance. Trump had two Heisman Trophy winners (Herschel Walker and Doug Flutie) and at least six well-established former NFL veterans on his 1985 team.
âThe Donald,â knew the value of star power and had a bigger plan in mind for his USFL team. Trump wanted to make a push to the more traditional fall schedule and force a merger with the NFL. If a merger or more likely an amalgamation of a few USFL teams by the NFL occurred, this would drastically raise the value of the franchises.
But the NFL didnât like to be forced into things. âThis is when the NFL really battled back, they didn’t want a competitor to come in and take away attention, airtime and revenue,â said Steve Ehrhart in 2005, part of owner of the Memphis Showboats. âThe NFL started using its power, pushing ABC not to put the games on if we moved to the fall.â
Before the USFL came around, Trump was just another real estate tycoon in New York. âBy buying the Generals he bought the back page of the New York tabloids, from âPage Sixâ of the New York Post, to the front page — he was everywhere,” said Charley Steiner in 2006, who was the play-by-play voice of the New Jersey Generals. âThis was his foray into the New York spotlight. He thought let’s go to the âbig timeâ and they [NFL] swatted him away like a fly at a picnic.â
ESPN, with no allegiance or contract with the NFL at the time, was prepared to televise a fall schedule by the USFL. ABC was getting pressure by the NFL to âpull-the-plugâ on their TV contract with the USFL if the spring league wanted to play in the fall.
Shootout at the O.K. Corral had nothing on the USFL v. NFL
The fall move depended solely on the success of the $1.69 billion antitrust suit against the NFL. It was a star-studded trial of names: Oakland Raidersâ owner Al Davis, legendary sportscaster Howard Cosell, Sen. Al DâMato, Trump and NFL Commissioner Peter Rozelle.
âIt was the âBonfire of the Vanities,ââ said  Bob Ley in 2005, a veteran ESPN sportscaster who covered the trial in the summer of 1986. âIt was a ‘Whoâs Whoâ of American football owners, tycoons and media. It was the perfect paradigm of the moment – rich guys suing rich guys.â
Despite the âred carpetâ names that highlighted the trial, it was the USFLâs lead counsel who stole the show – Harvey Myerson.
âThe day he [Myerson] had Rozelle on the stand, it was a âhigh-noonâ shootout,â Ley recalls with a sound of amusement in his voice. âPeteâs face was flushed and became so angry at Myersonâs theatrical line of questioning. At one point, Myerson pointed at Rozelle and called him âthis monopolist.â It was great theater and very entertaining.â
Rozelle, who was offered $13 million to be the commissioner of the USFL in 1982, but turned it down, was now the center of Myerson’s line of questioning.
Myerson threw in a final jab before the lunch break, and inquired about Rozelleâs salary from the NFL. Rozelle didn’t want to divulge his earnings from the NFL which was assumed to be enormous. âEveryone in the press was eager to hear this, but he never answered,â said Ley.
But there was more to come as Davis was set to take the stand as a witness for the USFL. Ley, who interviewed Davis the day before he testified in the summer of â86, said, âWhen Davis showed up as a USFL witness, that really ticked off the NFL. His testimony was âtreasonous, treasonousâ to the NFL.â
Davis, a maverick owner going back to the old AFL, won an antitrust lawsuit in 1982 after the league wouldn’t allow him to move from Oakland to Los Angeles. The NFL lost in court and Davis moved to Los Angeles.
When Davis was cross- examined by the NFL, he became upset at the line of questioning from the NFLâs counsel. Ley recalls that during a recess in the trial, Davis said to NFL executives, âBe careful questioning me here because thereâs a lot Iâm not saying.â
According to court documents, USFL v. NFL, Federal Court Judge Peter Leisure excluded Davis’ testimony about what Davis called âthe NFL’s âhabitual disregardâ of antitrust advice.â The judge also shot down the idea that the NFL had a pattern of breaking antitrust laws. âBecause testimony as to three or four episodes over a 20-year period was hardly sufficient to conclude that a pattern of behavior exists with respect to the conduct at issue here,â said Leisure.
âThe NFL has been denying monopoly status for years,â said Lester Munson, a sports legal analyst for Sports Illustrated in 2006. âThe NFL is not exempt from being a monopoly, only baseball is exempt. The NFL is clearly, obviously, and has been adjudicated many times as a cartel – a monopoly.â
NFL thought about taking in two USFL teams
Rozelle and the rest of the NFL were rattled enough that they discussed a possible âtaking inâ of a few USFL teams according to Carl Peterson, general manager of the Philadelphia Stars.
There was rumor of a backroom deal with Trump, A. Alfred Taubman and Tad Taube, owners of the Oakland Invaders and the NFL. Word had it that Trump just wanted a football and he didnât care in what city. The trial revealed there was a meeting between Trump and Rozelle at the Plaza Hotel in New York City.
âThe NFL did talk about the possibility of acquiring two teams from the USFL, but this wasnât enough for some owners,â said Peterson in 2006. âThey [NFL] said, âWeâll win this litigation,â which they were right on that. The NFL violates the antitrust [law] in regards to TV rights, but we didnât anticipate the decision. The NFL counsel convinced the jurors that these wealthy USFL owners knew what they were doing and the NFL didnât harm them financially.â
The NFL knew they were in violation of Sherman Antitrust Act, so they tried to “feel out” the USFL owners according to Petersonâs account. âThere were settlement talks, but unless they [NFL] made it financially rewarding to all of the USFL owners, a deal wouldnât be reached,â he said.
The NFL flexes their muscles on the TV networks
When plans were made to move to the fall in 1986, Rozelle buckled down, saying any network that showed their games would not be permitted to cover the NFL. ABC, which owned Monday Night Football, chose to terminate its contract with the USFL.
USFL Commissioner Henry Usher testified that he was told by Roone Arledge, the president of ABC Sports , that Arledge âhad a negative reaction from the NFL for putting the USFL on initially.â ABC sportscaster Howard Cosell testified that he was told by Arledge that Commissioner Rozelle was âall overâ Arledge because ABC was televising the USFL in the spring (Arledge denies he made such a statement to Cosell).
Jim Spence, a senior vice-president at ABC, testified that he believed that the NFL was âless than enamoredâ of the network’s dealings with the USFL.
âThe USFL couldn’t prove that the NFL’s behavior injured the USFL,â said Munson. âThe jury didnât like the USFLâs his clients: Donald Trump, Herschel Walker and such, they were unappealing individuals. They were very difficult to present as victims of anything. You need an appealing plaintiff to win an anti-trust suit. When Trump testified they lost all the emotional appeal of the case.â
âThe NFL has the ability to dominate the networks, which they ultimately did and still do,â said Ed Garvey, the former head of the NFLPA from 1971 thru 1983. âIf a new league came along, the NFL would either kill it or absorb it, thatâs its history.â
Garvey, who left the NFLPA to run for office in Milwaukee in 1983, and testified against the NFL during the antitrust suit, said, âIf the networks hadnât been in collusion with the NFL, going to the fall season would have worked for the USFL. But the networks got the word from the NFL that if they fooled around with a competitive league they werenât going to get any more games. It was a clear power-move by the NFL.â
In retrospect, it seems ludicrous that the USFL turned down so much money and pursue the antitrust suit and turndown the guaranteed TV money.
This decision to move to a fall schedule and leave major markets like Detroit, Philadelphia, Chicago, Pittsburgh and Washington, damaged the USFL’s relationship with ABC and ESPN.
ABC was so angered about these relocations, they withheld a significant portion of the USFL’s rights fees for the 1985 season. ESPN demanded a renegotiation of its proposed 1985-87 USFL contract.
Television ratings declined to 4.1 on ABC and 2.0 on ESPN during the âlame duckâ 1985 season. Despite the negative publicity the USFL faced, the leagueâs rating of 4.1 is higher than hockey, college basketball and football, and competitive with the NBA ratings of today.
âThe NFL knows itâs a monopoly; they thrive on it; they glory in it,â said Munson. âIf Myerson had succeeded and won $800 million [trebled would have added up to $2.4 billion], each team would have to pay their portion. But the commissioner views trebled damages as a way of doing business — they donât care. When it comes to a monopoly like the NFL, antitrust laws donât work.â
Despite being out of the league by the time the trial took place in 1986, Garvey was informed of the âback-door-dealingsâ between the NFL and the networks by Cosell. âI wasnât there when the conspiracy was hatched – they didnât invite me to those meetings,â said Garvey with a wry tone in his voice. âThey are the most powerful industry in this country because they have the male demographics from 19 to 49. They have enormous market power and they donât hesitate to use it.â
According to Garvey, Cosell, who testified against the NFL, felt it would be healthy for football to have another league. Cosell, an attorney before becoming the legendary ABC sportscaster, was in favor of two leagues, âbecause the owners and coaches would have to respond differently to players in the way they were treated, not just from a salary perspective.â
Is Trump to blame?
âThey [USFL owners] got greedy and tried to move to the fall a year before they should have,â said Steiner in 2006. âIt was headed in the right direction. If they wanted to go to the fall, they should have waited until 1987, the year of the NFL strike. With the threat of the strike, they would’ve had NFL players who were panicking about playing the season, they could have brought more players over there [USFL], and this would have ended the strike and facilitate some sort of a merger.â
âIf they had stayed in the spring, with the TV contracts in place, and the revenue streams, places like Birmingham and Jacksonville were huge opportunities,â said Dave Lapham in 2006, former Cincinnati Bengals and New Jersey Generals lineman. âIn the fall youâre not only competing against the NFL in the big cities like New York and Chicago, but in the South youâre going against college football. SEC football is religion. You canât win.â
âDonald was right in a lot of respects to get over the top, we had to go head-to-head against the big guys,â said Ehrhart. âWe could have stayed in the spring, but when we were compared to the NFL, there was a natural push to move to the fall. Do you stay in the spring and be branded a second league, and continue to be mocked by the NFL? â
âOne mistake they made was in â84 when Trump wanted to move the league to the fall, that led to the fall of the league,â said Dan Jiggetts in 2005, who was an offensive lineman for both the Chicago Bears and Blitz. âI donât blame Trump, but competing with the NFL is like competing against Godzilla in a stone-crushing match. It just didnât make sense, even if they thought the USFL might merge with the NFL, they [NFL] would never play by those rules.â
âOnce Trump bought the Generals, he changed the economics of the USFL,” said Ley. âHe was going to âbig time itâ -Â spend the money!â
âThere were a few owners who could pay the big bucks to the big stars, but I think the league made a mistake in trying to go to the fall,â said Marv Levy in 2006, former coach of the Chicago Blitz. âIt might have forced a merger like the AFL. I saw some cities where it was picking up tremendous momentum. It was a grave mistake to try and compete in the autumn.â
Ehrhart, who kept a skeletal staff in place, said, âWhen the crazy verdict came in, we thought we would win the appeal. Then we decided to suspend play. The greatest mistake was not ever playing the fall schedule. We could have carved out enough of a market share. If we would have played in â86 it would have forced a merger.â
âThe thing most frustrating is that period of time was about as much fun as any of us had ever had,â said Steiner, now broadcasting games for the Los Angeles Dodgers. âIt was new, a revolutionary spirit that we could do whatever we wanted like the sideline reporting.” It was so much fun, this rogue, revolutionary spirit. Whenever I see any of the players or coaches, it’s like an alumni club.â
âI think if the league would’ve stayed to the original plan like in 1983 with 12 instead of 18 teams, the league would have succeeded,â said Bobby Hebert, former quarterback for the Michigan Panthers and Oakland Invaders, in 2005. âBut when Donald Trump got involved and forced his hand to go head-to-head with the NFL, that wasn’t a wise decision on the league’s part.â
Trump was considered a bit of a misfit when it came to his sports knowledge and his âloveâ for football.
âDonald was always about Donald. When he first bought the Generals, at the first meeting he was like a panther in the back of the room,â said Peterson in June 2006, with a note of amusement in his voice. âHe got up and showed everyone at the meeting all the press coverage he got from buying the Generals. He said, âMy great USFL partners, it would have cost him a million dollars to get this kind of coverage in the real estate industry. This is the greatest thing that has ever happened to me.â We all looked at him each like, âthis is a real football oriented guy.ââ
More NFL
- Hard Knocks: Whoâs it Going to Be?
- Donovan McNabbâs Destination: Carolina Panthers?
- History Shows the Vikings Need to Trade Adrian Peterson
- Scorin Dorinâs Weekly Blog
- NFL Scout Talk: Interview Arian Foster
- Getting Psyched For A 2011 NFL Season
- Miami Dolphins: How to Lose a Franchise in 10 Years
- Jacoby Ford & Donnie Avery: Speed over Size
- The Fall of the USFL
- More Than Just a Quarterback: What Steve McNair Meant to the Titans
- Jamaal Charles, Kansas City Chiefs: #1 Fantasy Running Back
- The Dark Side of Thursday Football
- Carl Banks says Plaxico Burress could resign with the New York Giants
- NFL Players Turn To Porn During Lockout
- NFL Fans Prepare for Emotional Overload
- Everybody Hates Donovan
- Câmon, Are There Really 11 Wide Receivers Better than Brandon Marshall?
Tags: Al Davis, Al DâMato, Bobby Hebert, Carl Peterson, Charley Steiner, Dan Jiggetts, Dave Lapham, Donald Trump, Doug Flutie, Ed Garvey, Harvey Myerson, Henry Usher, Herschel Walker, Howard Cosell, Judge Peter Leisure, Marv Levy, Memphis Showboats, Michigan Panthers, New Jersey Generals, Oakland Invaders, Oakland Raiders, Peter Rozelle, Philadelphia Stars, Roone Arledge, Steve Ehrhart, USFL
Trackback from your site.
Got something to say?
To post a comment you must be logged in or Register Here.












